O
Toledo
← Community
InfrastructureCommunity discussion

Resolution No. 532-25 - Declaring it necessary and providing for the rehabilitation of sidewalks and driveway approaches on various streets in the City of Toledo.

Toledo

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (1)Opposed (6)Concerned (3)Neutral (1)

At a glance

Public comments
11
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Feb 13, 2026.

Public comments (11)

ConcernedLeonard HendricksFeb 13, 2026

Expressed concern over sidewalk panels slated for replacement near a city tree, hoping to save the tree and avoid being assessed for tree-root damage.

Board of Revision of Assessments - Feb 13, 2026 · 8:15 →
OpposedMark SysakFeb 13, 2026

Questioned the necessity of replacing sidewalk panels at 3209 Wendover Drive, noting a lack of visible defects and asking for clarification on ADA standards.

Board of Revision of Assessments - Feb 13, 2026 · 11:59 →
OpposedNancy RizcalaFeb 13, 2026

Disputed the need to replace seven sidewalk panels at 805 Locust Street, noting her property is immaculate while nearby vacant structures and open commercial buildings present greater community hazards.

Board of Revision of Assessments - Feb 13, 2026 · 16:58 →
ConcernedCraig HancockFeb 13, 2026

Questioned why panels previously replaced and paid for by the city due to tree damage 15-20 years ago are now being assessed to them, and criticized the cost of sending certified mail notices.

Board of Revision of Assessments - Feb 13, 2026 · 20:02 →
ConcernedMike KuharFeb 13, 2026

Spoke on behalf of Carolyn Kuhar regarding properties on 102nd Street, noting a driveway approach connects to an unpaved stone street and discussing walnut tree damage.

Board of Revision of Assessments - Feb 13, 2026 · 25:13 →
OpposedArian HendersonFeb 13, 2026

Objected to replacing six panels when only one has a minor defect, complained about missing work for meetings, and pointed out a pricing discrepancy between mailed notices and the city website.

Board of Revision of Assessments - Feb 13, 2026 · 30:16 →
NeutralDavid ZoglerFeb 13, 2026

Asked for clarification on how corner pedestrian ramps will be expanded and whether property owners will be assessed for ADA ramp work.

Board of Revision of Assessments - Feb 13, 2026 · 36:19 →
OpposedTerrence Hewling-ButteFeb 13, 2026

Argued that as a new homeowner who purchased the property in September, he should not be responsible for sidewalk damage evaluated years prior.

Board of Revision of Assessments - Feb 13, 2026 · 38:45 →
OpposedElizabeth DunbarFeb 13, 2026

Stated that heavy machinery from city demolition of adjacent vacant houses damaged her sidewalks years ago, and the city never returned to fix them as promised.

Board of Revision of Assessments - Feb 13, 2026 · 41:40 →
OpposedDean ThompsonFeb 13, 2026

Reported having video proof that four panels and a driveway approach at 632 Ogden have no cracks or settlement, and requested a reassessment.

Board of Revision of Assessments - Feb 13, 2026 · 45:15 →
SupportiveDr. Janethia FisherFeb 13, 2026

Explained the city's Sidewalk Grant program guidelines, income eligibility requirements, application process, and March 15th deadline.

Board of Revision of Assessments - Feb 13, 2026 · 46:25 →